I did not say it was a choice or not. I was not addressing that. You interpreted it that way. Some people happen to be Catholic. That’s a choice to. You’re nitpiking because you can’t win on substance.
“I did not say it was a choice or not. I was not addressing that. You interpreted it that way. “
By taking the stance that “some people just happen to be gay so they should be allowed to serve” implies that a homosexual’s sexual behaviour is not a choice. It is akin to saying that because they are naturally gay, we should not restrict their ability to join the military. The fact is that homosexuality is a behaviour choice and the fact is that the military excludes many different behaviours, one restricted behaviour is homosexual sex acts.
You are advocating that the military openly accept homosexual behaviour choices. I offered a logical argument that proves, by individual’s desires and homosexual advocacy groups’ agendas, that it is not a natural state of being for any person that choses to be homosexual. I have no issue with any individual’s choice to participate in any behaviour between consenting adults. I do have many issues with forcing the military to accept homosexual behaviour choices.
My own experience in the military gives me the knowledge that it is good policy to not allow homosexual behaviour for military members.