Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: melt

Whatever kind of “profile” this was meant to be, the author drew much more upon her personal prejudices than on the facts of the instances raised.

With the faintest of praise, Michelle is first dismissed as being just a little too brazen (or maybe just “uppity”), while the class envy of the British proletarian kicks in when discussing Cindy McCain. Cindy has too much money, she has too much good looks, she just has too much of everything, and damn it, she doesn’t DESERVE any of it!

A projectile spew. Don’t hold back, tell us how you REALLY feel, Camilla.


28 posted on 07/06/2008 7:27:58 PM PDT by alloysteel (Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., the candidate of change - change the rules, change your mind....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: alloysteel

I can assure you, women called Camilla who write for the “Style” section of the Times are not proletarian, by any stretch of the imagination.

Vapid, elitist and completely pointless, yes, but never proletarian.


86 posted on 07/07/2008 10:34:49 AM PDT by Brunanburh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson