Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: devere

There’s any even more compelling reason which has been posited on one of the other threads here, which is that it was essential to cover that section of the certificate to hide the fact that there was NO number. They could not put in a fake number because it could then be checked for accuracy.


20 posted on 07/06/2008 11:32:01 PM PDT by Nipfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Nipfan

“They could not put in a fake number because it could then be checked for accuracy.”

You are quite correct, but I’ve decided it is also in accord with human nature for a staff member to cover the number on a legitimate certificate of a well known person, “just to be safe”. What the actual case is here is still uncertain.


21 posted on 07/07/2008 6:48:48 AM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: Nipfan

The certificate number is 151 1961 NNNNNN.

151, YYYY, NNNNNN where NNNNNN is the birth count at that point in the year. It’s not top secret.


23 posted on 07/21/2008 5:02:47 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson