Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

“..”What mattered was the government’s position that none of the above was relevant because ‘[T]here’s no indication it makes any difference under the statute. If you pull the trigger once and it fires more than one round, no matter what the cause it’s a machine gun.’..”

This is the kind of shyster reasoning that makes the Goverment, particularly the BATF, hated.


32 posted on 07/04/2008 12:25:06 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Anti-Bubba182
”What mattered was the government’s position that none of the above was relevant because ‘[T]here’s no indication it makes any difference under the statute. If you pull the trigger once and it fires more than one round, no matter what the cause it’s a machine gun.’..”

By the BATF's definition, would not most double-barrel shotguns qualify as machine guns? After all, by their definition, something that can be readily modified to be a machine gun is a machine gun, and most double-barrel shotguns could easily be so modified (e.g. two-trigger models could be made to fire twice with one trigger pull by simply fastening the triggers together).

36 posted on 07/04/2008 12:56:42 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson