Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: David
Take a look at 8 USCA Sec. 1401(g). The current version of the section applies only to persons born after November, 1986--Obama was born in 1961 so the rule prior to November 86 applies.

Which would be the act passed in 1952. According to that Obama would still be a citizen. But this whole line of discussion is really pointless because Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore he is a natural born U.S. citizen under the 14th Amendment.

108 posted on 07/11/2008 4:04:44 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

“Which would be the act passed in 1952. According to that Obama would still be a citizen. But this whole line of discussion is really pointless because Obama was born in Hawaii and therefore he is a natural born U.S. citizen under the 14th Amendment. “

Correct.

But you have to understand the background. An attempt to ‘prove’ or ‘show’ Barack wasnt born in Hawaii:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2040486/posts


129 posted on 07/11/2008 10:12:53 AM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - NObama, stop the Hype and Chains candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson