All the statutory material is set forth; effective dates and relationship to the facts are described.
So if you want to sit here and argue the world is flat, you are welcome to do so. If you really want to address the legal issues, you pick up the statute and say here is the one that applies; here is why. You say Sec. 301 (or 309) applies--here is the subsection; here is what it says; here are the facts that would put Obama under the statute and make him a citizen. Read the opinion. Get a grip.
Hardly. You cite a case which doesn't apply because the laws that case was decided under had been changed long before the decision was handed down.
So if you want to sit here and argue the world is flat, you are welcome to do so.
And if I did I would not be surprised to find you believing it, if it supported your bizzare poisiton. If you really want to address the legal issues, you pick up the statute and say here is the one that applies; here is why. You say Sec. 301 (or 309) applies--here is the subsection; here is what it says; here are the facts that would put Obama under the statute and make him a citizen. Read the opinion. Get a grip.
Which I did. I provided the link to the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952 which was in effect when Obama was born. The applicable section is Title III, Chapter 1, Act 301. Or didn't you bother reading the link I provided?