Last week, changes were made to the bill that Brian Johnston of the California Pro-Life Council calls “bell and whistle amendments” that looked good but did not remove the significant concerns pro-life advocates have with the bill. I can't say I'm surprised.
1 posted on
07/03/2008 1:38:16 PM PDT by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; 8mmMauser
2 posted on
07/03/2008 1:38:53 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 230FMJ; 50mm; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; An American In Dairyland; ...
3 posted on
07/03/2008 1:39:33 PM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
That headline set off my “Well, Duh!” alarm.
4 posted on
07/03/2008 1:43:55 PM PDT by
kimmie7
(<<<---- Too surly for the hoarde.)
To: wagglebee
. . .and voluntary stopping of eating and drinking as legitimate means of pain control. . .Then by all means, lets do away with all the food banks, food donations to third world countries, and monetary donations to help provide clean water systems throughout the world.
If withholding of food and water eliminate pain, then we'd be doing everyone a favor by not feeding them and giving them clean water to drink . . .
Right?
5 posted on
07/03/2008 1:53:50 PM PDT by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall cause you to vote against the Democrats.)
To: wagglebee
So these “Pro-Life” advocates could support a euthanasia bill?
6 posted on
07/03/2008 5:17:50 PM PDT by
newzjunkey
("La Raza is the Klu Klux Klan With a Tan" - Roger Hedgecock, 7/3/08)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson