Yes, of course, thank you. Nothing like being condescended to before lunch. I just thought people who read these kinds of stories might be interested in more of the specific details, rather than just the broad gist of what happened as reported by the BBC, which didn’t even bother to identify the court or the judge. But I guess I was wrong. Silly me. Who knew context was a no-no?
Oh stop. I understand what you’re saying. The two cases = apples and bowling balls.