Posted on 07/03/2008 8:27:18 AM PDT by LibWhacker
What about YouTube deleting pro-life videos at the behest of abortionists?
This is so f**king ridiculous.
Youtube is the ONLY source of a lot of the stuff that people watch!
I love when companies scream “copyright infringement” on something that YOU CAN NO LONGER BUY! Like old sitcoms and stuff.
Yep. Expect that 3 AM knock in the not-distant-enough future.
By users, do they mean gmail user ID, or actually any anonymous user by IP address? If so, this information could be also be used by other inquirers to track those who have viewed political videos as well, or left comments at sites, viewed “rumors” in the news, etc. etc...
They’re already doing this for China, evidently.
got tinfoil?
Our Founders would not recognize America as is exists today. The Bill of Rights is invalidated if a “US Court” says so.
Viacom owns CBS and is deeply connected to the Clintons via the money chain...
Big Brother is watching us.
First they came for the....
When it happens to FreeRepublic, they'll want to know the ip address of every user who has ever clicked on a FreeRepublic link, how long he or she viewed it before clicking on another FR link, and (if he was a registered user) every comment he ever made on FR (including all the FreepMail he exchanged with other Freepers).
This will be a very, very bad precedent if it stands (I just wish I knew what those odds were).
What does that have to do with this story?
You Tube is so 2007, it is old hat.
This was a stupid decision. I wonder if the judge in that case will now try to get my IP and address from this post...
How does "even money" grab you?
This judge must be taken down, tarred, feathered, and ridden out of town on a rail ~ and as quickly as possible as that can be arranged.
I think I will file an appeal ~
Kinda low. :-(
Another violation of the 4th Amendment (RIP).
The Jihad on Drugs takes another scalp.
I dont really go to youtube much, but I do catch things occasionally from within sites that have embedded things.
I have an account there, why I don’t know, but they can kiss my ass... raiding a home over some kind of watching of a video that MIGHT be “copyright infringement” will get people killed, very quickly.
Roger that.
What I’m confused about here is that the viewer does not download the file, like they would an MPG via file sharing. I know there’s third party aps. that allow it, but as a rule, the clips are streamed. There’s no transfer of data. So, any “infringement” rests on the original uploader, and YouTube, not the file viewer.
So why would they want a “viewer log”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.