Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brokerage-firm failure has to be an option: Paulson (orchestrating orderly retreat?)
Market Watch ^ | 07/02/08 | Greg Robb

Posted on 07/02/2008 6:03:34 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

Brokerage-firm failure has to be an option: Paulson

By Greg Robb, MarketWatch

Last update: 1:09 p.m. EDT July 2, 2008

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson will stress in a speech later Wednesday that federal regulators must craft a system to allow brokerage firms to fail without threatening the overall financial system.

"For market discipline to constrain risk effectively, financial institutions must be allowed to fail," Paulson said in excerpts of a speech he will deliver in London.

"It is clear that some institutions, if they fail, can have a systemic impact, so we must give regulators the authorities to limit that impact and facilitate an orderly failure," Paulson said.

At present, Washington has robust powers to gradually shut down troubled commercial banks, but lacks similar powers over broker-dealers.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brokeragefirm; orderlyfailure; shutdown
In my view, this should have been done well before credit crisis. This has come too late.
1 posted on 07/02/2008 6:03:35 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; Uncle Ike; RSmithOpt; jiggyboy; 2banana; Travis McGee; OwenKellogg; 31R1O; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 07/02/2008 6:04:24 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster (kim jong-il, chia head, ppogri, In Grim Reaper we trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Well, better late than never.

It seems that financial regulators, like generals, are always getting ready to fight the last war.


3 posted on 07/02/2008 6:06:34 PM PDT by A Balrog of Morgoth (QMC(SW) USN........ CG21 DD988 FFG34 PC6 ARS53)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Back to the future?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savings_and_Loan_crisis


4 posted on 07/02/2008 6:09:59 PM PDT by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

There are plenty of laws to prosecute the crooks that are involved with fraudulent loan apps, naked shorts, and BS security/bond ratings.

This is all smoke to let these crooks walk.


5 posted on 07/02/2008 6:29:12 PM PDT by spanalot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spanalot

“This is all smoke to let these crooks walk.”

Exactly.


6 posted on 07/02/2008 6:32:30 PM PDT by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OCC

Silverado Savings and Loan
Silverado Savings and Loan collapsed in 1988, costing taxpayers $1.6 billion. Neil Bush, son of then Vice President of the United States George H. W. Bush, was Director of Silverado at the time. Neil Bush was accused of giving himself a loan from Silverado, but he denied all wrongdoing. [2]

The US Office of Thrift Supervision investigated Silverado’s failure and determined that Neil Bush had engaged in numerous “breaches of his fiduciary duties involving multiple conflicts of interest.” Although Bush was not indicted on criminal charges, a civil action was brought against him and the other Silverado directors by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; it was eventually settled out of court, with Bush paying $50,000 as part of the settlement, as reported in the Washington Post [11].

As a director of a failing thrift, Bush voted to approve $100 million in what were ultimately bad loans to two of his business partners. And in voting for the loans, he failed to inform fellow board members at Silverado Savings & Loan that the loan applicants were his business partners.[citation needed]

Silverado’s collapse cost taxpayers $1.3 billion.

Neil Bush paid a $50,000 fine and was banned from banking activities for his role in taking down Silverado, which cost taxpayers $1.3 billion. A Resolution Trust Corporation Suit against Bush and other officers of Silverado was settled in 1991 for $26.5 million.

A Republican fundraiser set up a fund to help defer costs Neil Bush incurred in his S&L dealings.[citation needed]

No rats involved in S&Ls!


7 posted on 07/02/2008 6:52:21 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Demorats tax returns consists of "welfare in" and " child support out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: razorback-bert
No rats involved in S&Ls!

I wouldn't go that far...

But I can see why McCain would like to keep this bit of history in the past as well.

8 posted on 07/02/2008 7:07:48 PM PDT by OCC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OCC

I was thinking of John Connelly.


9 posted on 07/02/2008 7:42:30 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Demorats tax returns consists of "welfare in" and " child support out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson