Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ZULU
"And I think your praise of Bush II has been a little .... DRAMATIC and bends reality a bit."

I stated facts. If you don't think so then by all means point something specific out that I wrote and we can discuss it.

33 posted on 07/02/2008 1:36:36 PM PDT by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: avacado

See my last post.

Bush takes office in 2001

- There are 6 state sponsors of terror: N. Korea, Libya,
Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Iran.

Bush leaves office in 2009

“- There are only 2 states sponsors of terror: Syria, Iran.”

Afghanistan is gone but still fighting, N. Korea, as
usual, is playing games, Libya is still a threat and
more so than before due to our failure to take out Syria
and Iran. And you failed to mention that incubator of
anti-western hatred in your list - Wahhabist Saudi
Arabia who spawned some of the terrorists in the World
Trade Center Attack and continues to bankroll anti-
American mosques and madrassehs in the U.S.

“During the Bush Administration the black market from Pakistan led by A.Q.Khan for nuclear weapons technology is broken up.”

Pakistan remains a serious problem, probaly continuing to provide sanctuary to Bin Laddin, and continuing to be a site of anti-western, pro-Islamic terrorists. (By the way, they did a GREAT job with the Benazir Bhutto episode, didn’t they?)

“During the Bush Administration North Korea begins dismantling their plutonium enrichment reactors.”

North Korea has been playing these games for years. They will continue to do so. I’m not impressed. Come back in 5 years.

“During the Bush Administration Israel and the U.S.A. destroy Syria’s nuclear weapons enrichment reactors.”

????????????? During the Bush Administration, the Israelis and Bush fail to take out the terrorist cornered in southern Palestine. They survive and go on to kill more Americans and Israelis.

“During the Bush Administration, Saddam Hussein who said quite clearly while in jail awaiting his trial that he would have had the U.N. sanctions broken and be in full production of WMDs within a year. That would be the years 2004 - 2005 approximately that Saddam would have been re-armed with WMDs. It now goes without saying the obvious that Saddam will not be getting nuclear weapons anytime soon. Nor will he be directly funding and training the terror group ‘Islamic Jihad’ which is al-Qaeda and whom blew up two U.S. embassies. (see the recent: Iraqi Perspectives Project). “

O.K. Score two for Bush.

“During the Bush Administration the U.S.A. has nuclear weapon ambitious Iran pinned in on both sides from Afghanistan and Iraq which is pure strategic genius. “

No. Genius would have been taking out Iran out initially from both sides while Iranian students were rioting after our invasion of Iraq. At this point, the Muslims think Bush and the U.S. are paper tigers.

“Under Clinton the countries Pakistan and India successfully test nuclear weapons and North Korea begins plutonium enrichment. “

So what? Am I defending that idiot?


36 posted on 07/02/2008 1:48:45 PM PDT by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson