Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/02/2008 6:26:26 AM PDT by shrinkermd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: shrinkermd

The “Gang of Nine” must have some pretty sorry law clerks working for them right now.


2 posted on 07/02/2008 6:28:07 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

I find it very suprising that nobody ever pointed this out (or aparently was aware of it) during the entirety of the preceedings. Despite the meaningful error though, I’d say there a 3-4 % chance that someone in the majority would flip and vote to reconsider.


5 posted on 07/02/2008 6:58:44 AM PDT by samson1097
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

“This inventory of jurisdictions was a central part of the court’s analysis, the foundation for Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s conclusion in his majority opinion that capital punishment for child rape was contrary to the “evolving standards of decency” by which the court judges how the death penalty is applied.

One minor typo in the above.

“..capital punishment for child rape was contrary to the “DEvolving standards of decency”.

That fixes it.


6 posted on 07/02/2008 7:22:56 AM PDT by GladesGuru (In a society predicated upon freedom, it is essential to examine principles,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

But facts don’t matter to absolute rulers.


9 posted on 07/02/2008 8:28:47 AM PDT by omega4412
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/07/supreme_courts_embarrassing_er.html


10 posted on 07/02/2008 8:40:10 AM PDT by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: shrinkermd
It turns out that Justice Kennedy’s confident assertion about the absence of federal law was wrong.

Yes, well Stevens seems to think Miller's conviction was upheld (never mind that the bottom like on U.S. v. Miller is "REVERSED AND REMANDED".

BTW, I thought the pro-RKBA briefs talked about the Miller case. Did Stevens et al. even read them?

13 posted on 07/02/2008 5:09:14 PM PDT by supercat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson