Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj
Well, have fun stewing in your juices and getting angry over events and statements made by Romney in the past that he can't rectify. What good does criticizing him now do? We criticized him through the primaries for it, as we should have, HE LOST THE PRIMARIES - but if he's being considered for VP by McCain, then that simply means per McCain that Romney's positives outweigh his negatives and is probably the best VP option out there out of a miniscule pool of Governors and ex-businessmen.

I have no intention of voting for Barr or the libertarians. If Romney can nudge McCain to the right some more, and if that helps McCain to stop pandering to the illegals and global warming nuts then voting for the ticket is a no-brainer.

331 posted on 07/02/2008 9:41:21 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (BARACK OBAMA WILL SAVE US! HE HAS RISEN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies ]


To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
"Well, have fun stewing in your juices and getting angry over events and statements made by Romney in the past that he can't rectify."

It's everything he does from now on (were he to be the running mate) that is of paramount concern. A zebra does not change his stripes. He's not going to all of a sudden start being honest or demonstrating any level of character. That's just not in his nature.

"What good does criticizing him now do?"

It is to make it plain that the Conservative base will not tolerate a liberal fraud being attached to the GOP ticket (McCain is odious enough, but he still has time to put a giant like Sanford on the ticket and at least partly redeem himself). I not only do not want to see him as the running mate, but I do not want to see him in the Cabinet, either. He is not to be trusted under any circumstances.

"We criticized him through the primaries for it, as we should have, HE LOST THE PRIMARIES - but if he's being considered for VP by McCain, then that simply means per McCain that Romney's positives outweigh his negatives and is probably the best VP option out there out of a miniscule pool of Governors and ex-businessmen."

He has NO positives. None. Nada. Zip. Zilcho. He is the worst possible choice for VP for the GOP. He, however, would be an excellent choice for Obama given his record, his deceitful conduct, and his actions in assisting the Democrat party. I cited there is a substantial number of Republicans who are far and away an excellent choice to be VP, but I stand 100% behind Mark Sanford. He has almost no negatives, with the experience to step into the job of President without breaking a sweat.

"I have no intention of voting for Barr or the libertarians. If Romney can nudge McCain to the right some more, and if that helps McCain to stop pandering to the illegals and global warming nuts then voting for the ticket is a no-brainer."

How can he help to nudge McCain to the right when his entire claim of being a Conservative is a big, gigantic lie ? The man's a 100% phony fraud, period.

367 posted on 07/02/2008 6:13:15 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson