Couldn't agree more. If anyone wants to leave a message of support for the family, click on the picture link below...
Posted on 07/01/2008 1:16:51 PM PDT by RedRover
Uhh... is the judge going to allow evidence regarding if these ..syrians..were terrorists or just on vacation, a religious pilgrimage perhaps, to one of iraq's many "holy" cities? Maybe they were kneeling down to pray./sarc.
Appears that everywhere muhammad(may pigs be upon him) took a dump is a "holy" city.
Couldn't agree more. If anyone wants to leave a message of support for the family, click on the picture link below...
I’m sure they were planting date palms alongside the road.
It takes two teams, two vehicles, a truck, and a black bag.
And they place them right under the road where vehicles travel because date palms like to hitchhike. (That’s how they get dates.)
/sarc
This is a complete head-scratcher, jaz. They sound like defense witnesses but that’s not how these hearings go. What the heck is the prosecution’s case?
Those were my exact thoughts, Red, the prosecution always goes first.
The only thing I can figure is the prosecution wants to go through the formality that Sgt. Winnick and his men did shoot at them but can’t figure why they’d have to.
I’m assuming they didn’t find an IED (maybe because the truck got away) and that the dead Syrians weren’t on an insurgent database.
Maybe the two wounded Syrians told doctors they were innocent and that’s why charges were brought.
In any case, Sgt Winnick may have prevented an IED from being planted. You never get credit for catastrophes you prevent. But to get charged with murder and assault under these circumstances is insane.
Agreed. I have a feeling the Marine Corps is about up to here with this crap. I predict there will be no charges.
Them Syrians shoulda stayed in Syria.
I said:I wonder what is the standard?
You said:Based on what’s been reported so far, I’d say there is none. I hope this prosecution makes more sense when we’ve heard about the whole day’s testimony.
My thought: If there is nothing more to this, I find it disgusting that this soldier is even being investigated.
You said:BTW, I also agree with your tagline—and he can bring the Del-Tones with him
My thought: The Ventures finally made it this year (the 23rd induction ceremony), so there may be some hope. I read that Dick Dale is battling cancer again. He was to have surgery in April. I hope all is well with him. He is one of a kind.
They killed Four Syrians? These Marines should be getting medals.
So that's where the term "Holy Shite" came from.
So according to the report from the accused Marine’s officers, this shooting was well within the rules of engagement. So what’s the beef?
They took a skilled Marine scout sniper off the line less than a month into his tour. They probably restricted his entire squad while they were questioned — losing their services for a significant period. And for what? So that we could show Syria our ‘due dilligence’? That country that was building a NK-Nuke reactor right under our noses (until the Israeli’s took it out). Doesn’t anybody have a backbone anymore?
I wonder how many IED’s got laid successfuly in that sector of Anbar Province because the RCT in that area didn’t have enough observers to cover the ground. How many Humvee’s & their soldier/sailor/Marine drivers got wasted? How many Iraqi civilians got hurt?
This is beyond Stupidity. It’s criminal — the prosecution that is. / Rant OFF
Yet more Marines being punished for performing their duty.
Motives in killing of Iraqi civilians traded at Article 32 hearing
CAMP PENDLETON -- Was Sgt. John Winnick II following the military's rules of engagement when he fatally shot two Iraqi civilians and possibly injured two others last July 17? Or was he a trigger-happy killer who failed to make sure those civilians posed a risk to him and his sniper unit?
The questions were debated Tuesday by prosecutors and Winnick's defense team during an Article 32 hearing at Camp Pendleton. The proceeding will help determine whether Winnick is court-martialed on charges of voluntary manslaughter, aggravated assault and failure to obey orders or regulations.
If convicted, he could be imprisoned for 40 years and receive a dishonorable discharge.
Winnick is a San Diego native who graduated from Winston High School in Del Mar in 2002. He was on his fourth combat tour when the incident that led to the court proceedings took place near Lake Tharthar in the Anbar province of western Iraq.
On that day, he and five other members of a sniper team were monitoring a mosque and an abandoned store for insurgents. They became suspicious when a succession of vehicles stopped on a nearby road and looked like they were planting a roadside bomb, Sgt. Alexander Wazenkewitz, a team member, testified Tuesday.
Awhile after those vehicles left, an 18-wheel truck stopped at almost the same spot and the driver got out to remove a bag under the truck, Wazenkewitz said.
Winnick shot the driver to death with his rifle and ordered his men to disable the truck. In the ensuing moments, Winnick killed another Iraqi civilian and either he or his Marines injured two more. The truck wasn't searched before it was removed from the site.
As the Article 32 hearing continues, witnesses are expected to testify about the complexity of the military's rules of engagement. Those regulations have been interpreted differently by the Marine Corps' legal and intelligence officers, according to their comments in previous cases involving allegedly unlawful killings of Iraqis.
Capt. Jeffrey King is overseeing Winnick's Article 32 session. Later on, he will recommend to Lt. Gen. Samuel Helland, the convening authority in the case, whether Winnick should go to trial.
Winnick is a member of the Camp Pendleton-based 3rd Battalion, 1st Marine Division. He was working with the 13th Marine Expeditionary Unit, also based at Camp Pendleton, when the Lake Tharthar incident occurred.
Winnick pre-enlisted in the Marines at age 17 and became a combat veteran at 20.
His battlefield exploits in the 2004 battle of Fallujah, Iraq, caught the eye of author Bing West.
In the book "No True Glory: A Frontline Account of the Battle for Falljuah," Bing described the intensity of the fighting and Winick's actions: "They rushed down to the street. As they moved up the alley, Lance Cpl. John Winnick, a machine-gunner, ran toward (Lt. Jesse) Grapes with a (rocket-propelled grenade) launcher and a bag full of rockets."
"Sir, can I shoot these back at them?" Winnick yelled.
"Do you know how to use that thing?" Grapes asked.
Winnick had never held or fired the launcher during combat, but he convinced Grapes to let him do it then. He fired twice, blowing open a gate and then hitting a fuel drum inside a house as Marines cheered.
"In minutes the fire had spread through the first floor, and the insurgents had fled," Bing wrote.
Winnick's family and friends have create a Web site to support him and seek donations for his legal defense.
Five Marines posted comments on the site, including Wazenkewitz.
"I was at John's side on June 17th and I would have done everything exactly the same. He did nothing wrong," Wazenkewitz wrote. "I have nothing but respect for that man and would take a bullet for him any day."
can the middle finger be used as a trigger finger....
If Perry’s there, too, this is definitely getting more coverage than I expected!
I haven’t seen anything yet that leads me to think there’s a real case here. But that’ll be up to Capt King and Gen Helland.
BTW, I mentioned somewhere else that Capt King is also part of the Chessani defense team. That gives me more confidence that he’ll be impartial and just look at the evidence.
Thanks to you both.
It seems that Perry’s piece is somewhat different than the other two.
Don’t know what to think about the company commander warning snipers that “the Marine Corps eats its young.” Doesn’t seem like a very good way of installing morale in your men, depending on the circumstances and the way it was said.
Glad this is getting the coverage that it is. So far I would say the public should be supporting Sgt. Winnick and his Marines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.