You know, you would look smarter if your posts were based on what I've written. Actually, I've questioned the only conclusion you've offered, which is that Flight 800 did not suffer a mechanical failure. In order to question that, I asked you about two things: The size of the conspiracy necessary and whether that conspiracy would be easier to believe in than the idea that a plane with 93,300 flight hours would have a mechanical failure.
The bulk of the evidence says in a loud voice that it was a shoulder or tripod fired expanding rod missle that hit TWA 800.
But wait a minute...You pointed me to the brilliance of Cashill, who has decided that the Navy was shooting missiles into crowded airspace at a plane trying to collide with Flight 800. You said I had to address his findings before I could even discuss this subject. Yet you've come up with something completely different. How strange...So, if you don't believe the Navy was playing Russian Roulette in the airlanes, why does Cashill? (I don't either, but you're the one who brought up Cashill.)
Oh, and can you identify the type of missile? I'm not aware of any production missiles that were shoulder/tripod fired and had an expanding rod warhead, and it's not terribly likely terrorists would have access to experimental models, is it? You might also want to consider the fact that there are only a couple of models of man-portable SAM that can hit a target at 13,000 feet...and they have the wrong warheads.
Lastly, how is it that this continuous-rod extra long range missile took the plane out without leaving evidence of structural damage? None was found on the fuselage...oh wait, I forgot, it was a huge coverup. So, once again we're back to me asking you how many people would have to be involved.
While you're calculating that, consider that the NTSB has placed the wreckage of N93119 in their training center in Virginia, an awfully funny thing to do with a bird that's had a continuous rod pass through the forward fuselage. You might also want to take a look at post 303.
Little boy, I said that you had to address Cashill to reach the entry level of the discussion, which you have still failed to do.