The similarity between sales of carbon offsets and medieval church indulgences is striking, not least because there’s about equal proof that the two actually work.
I’ve always wondered about this concept. It’s supposed to be beneficial to buy carbon credits, but it always gets me that you are still producing the same “evil” carbon pollution footprint as before. You have simply paid someone for the continuing priviledge of having the allegedly evil carbon footprint. You haven’t done anything to reduce your own emissions by buying a carbon credit.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
***Ive always wondered about this concept. Its supposed to be beneficial to buy carbon credits, but it always gets me that you are still producing the same evil carbon pollution footprint as before. You have simply paid someone for the continuing priviledge of having the allegedly evil carbon footprint. You havent done anything to reduce your own emissions by buying a carbon credit.***
Dilbert, you’ve got that exactly right. The same amount of carbon is involved, whether you create it or the person you sell your carbon rights to creates it.
IT’S A BIG SCAM, and Al Gore and others are getting richer and richer by promoting it.