The article seems to be about what CAN be done. The questions are: What HAS been done. Were they able to determine (beyond any reasonable doubt) which lab the attack anthrax came from? If so, which lab was it?
It seems very clear that the science of microbial forensics is now ready for court -- as far as the authors of this article are concerned.
Is everything and everyone else ready?
Thanks for bringing this article to our attention, ZACKandPOOK.
Of course, that would only let them point at a lab. They would still need solid evidence of other types to point at an individual in that lab.