Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Hypocrisy of WALL-E (more environmentalist propaganda)
National Review ^ | 06/29 01:52 PM | [Greg Pollowitz]

Posted on 06/29/2008 5:43:02 PM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines

I saw WALL-E with my five year old on Saturday night. It was like a 90-minute lecture on the dangers of over consumption, big corporations, and the destruction of the environment.

All this from mega-company Disney, who wants us to buy WALL-E kitsch for our kids that are manufactured in China at environment-destroying factories and packed in plastic that will take hundreds of year to biodegrade in our landfills.

Much to Disney's chagrin, I will do my part to avoid future environmental armageddon by boycotting any and all WALL-E merchandise and I hope others join my crusade.


TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS: environment; envirowhackos; hollywood; moviereview; prpagandawingofdnc; walle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: itsPatAmerican
I want to see this movie. The WSJ’s review on Friday AND Saturday, are enough to make time next weekend.
21 posted on 06/29/2008 6:35:53 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I am honestly glad you feel that way- I love Disney and it’s a big part of my family’s life....but I just shook my head as I was watching the movie...


22 posted on 06/29/2008 6:37:02 PM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America

Besides why reduce a film this complex to one simple message and miss out on one of the most artful studio films in years? The first half was almost like a Buster Keaton comedy.


23 posted on 06/29/2008 6:38:27 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Any story can have multiple (and sometimes contradictory) messages. It is largely a function of the viewers views. I liked it, my kids liked it. The humans didn’t take the easy way out in the end, they rolled up their sleeves and did the hard work necessary.


24 posted on 06/29/2008 6:41:44 PM PDT by itsPatAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Uhmmm...I do...

Generally, if they like something, it cannot be something I would like. Conversely, if they disliked a something - like a policy or candidate or movie, the odds would be good I would like it.

You’re entitled to your opinion and you know more about it than I because you have seen it. But what I have read about it from usually reliable sources paints a different picture of than your commentary does.


25 posted on 06/29/2008 6:44:16 PM PDT by NucSubs (Cognitive dissonance: Conflict or anxiety resulting from inconsistency between beliefs and actions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

Couldn’t you have made your point without the name calling?

The tone is getting very rude around here


26 posted on 06/29/2008 6:46:58 PM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NucSubs

So if they liked the Sisten Chapel you would dislike it? Art doesn’t work that way.


27 posted on 06/29/2008 6:55:28 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I’m pretty sure he was addressing the author and not the poster, since he called him by name. However I agree that once name-calling and profanity start, the argument has been lost because you cannot persuade by those methods.


28 posted on 06/29/2008 6:55:59 PM PDT by secret garden (Dubiety reigns here)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy

Johnny-5 would kick Wall-E’s backside!


29 posted on 06/29/2008 7:02:28 PM PDT by getarope (I don't like McCain, but I'll pick him over Osama Obama ANYTIME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
.humans were depicted as fat, lazy slobs who have everything done for them.

Don't forget. The humans were living in micro-gravity for 700 years and lost a considerable amount of bone mass. This was explained in the film.

30 posted on 06/29/2008 7:13:08 PM PDT by pjd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Much to Disney's chagrin, I will do my part to avoid future environmental armageddon by boycotting any and all WALL-E merchandise and I hope others join my crusade.

Party pooper!

31 posted on 06/29/2008 7:14:03 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

I wasn’t being rude to anyone “around here.”

“Greg” is the author of the silly article at National Review Online.

Though you’re right, to the extent I could’ve given him the benefit of the doubt and said he’d “taken leave of his senses” instead of calling him an idiot.

But for someone who makes a snide point about starting the 10-millionth boycott of a company to which he JUST PAID admission to their movie...well...he deserves some snippyness.

Further, you are also correct that the fragging around here has hit all time highs.


32 posted on 06/29/2008 7:24:37 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Borges
It’s in the tradition of Brave New World and 2001.

Both of which were great societal commentary and dramatic masterpieces. Neither of which should be done by Disney for kids, though.

33 posted on 06/29/2008 7:27:18 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: secret garden
However I agree that once name-calling and profanity start, the argument has been lost because you cannot persuade by those methods.

Yes, secret, I was railing on the author of the article.

And I could've been nicer...but the contradiction in the article is so frustrating.

Yaking offense and promising to start a boycott--- just right after you pay that company $40 in admission for yourself and your child to see a film you deem as worthy boycotting?

Aside from whether or not the film is good/worth it/propaganda/masterpiece....the article is too cute by half....or just dumb.

34 posted on 06/29/2008 7:32:48 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

There are plenty works of this sort that kids read...Animal Farm, Farenheit 451. This film’s content isn’t as disturbing as the aforementioned.


35 posted on 06/29/2008 7:37:22 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
It was like a 90-minute lecture on the dangers of over consumption, big corporations, and the destruction of the environment.

It was also a 90-minute lecture on the dangers of letting your life be run by an authoritarian entity (and the whole BnL corporation screamed 'government-run' to me), the virtues of individualism, and how working hard for something you want accomplished is much more effective, efficient, and rewarding than letting a giant state-esque entity do it for you (while failing).

36 posted on 06/29/2008 7:50:19 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007 (Look at all the candidates. Choose who you think is best. Choose wisely in 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

?

Not the movie my familly saw.


37 posted on 06/29/2008 7:59:25 PM PDT by securityman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

How is the movie incoherent? The movie is a love story about two little robots.


38 posted on 06/29/2008 7:59:25 PM PDT by securityman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: itsPatAmerican

I felt that Wall*E was extremely heavy-handed in its message. I normally love all of Pixar’s films, but this one seriously left a bad taste in my mouth.

BTW- if you’re interested in my basic review, feel free to scope out my blog:
A_Baran.1up.com


39 posted on 06/29/2008 7:59:33 PM PDT by 3rdJudgement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
It was like a 90-minute lecture on the dangers of over consumption, big corporations, and the destruction of the environment.

Ah... so they repackaged the plot of Silent Running.

40 posted on 06/29/2008 9:10:35 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson