A fetus that is allowed to become a person is going to require food, water, shelter, etc.
If that fetus can't be expected to become a person that will proportionally increase the production of the above, then maybe abortion is the right choice.
Easy energy and advances in the sciences have allowed humanity to produce a surplus in food, shelter, etc, year after year to be consumed by greater and greater numbers of people.
Do you think it can go on forever? And do you think as things get tougher, that those hungry masses are going to respect YOUR needs for energy and food, etc?
Why do Mexicans risk dying in the desert to come to the United States? Because Mexico has already moved past the point of overpopulation. There is very little surplus left. Any surplus is taken and consumed, mostly through the Democratic process.
It all comes down to productivity versus fecundity. If productivity doesn't increase proportionally with population, then what is produced must be divided into smaller and smaller pieces. Or go someplace else where they can get a bigger share of the pie.
LOL, the old Malthusian fallacy. More people means more possibilities.
Out of curiosity, two questions - what faith do you practice and who are you voting for in the Presidential race and why?
Despicable. Who made you God?
The very purpose of our Constitution, according to our Constitution, is to secure the Blessings of Liberty, not just to ourselves, but to our Posterity...in other words those who have not yet been born. The Founders gave the rights of those who were yet to come equal standing with their own.
And the Fifth and the Fourteenth Amendments protect the unlienable right to life of all Persons. That includes babies, from the point of fertilization.
Any other position has you somewhere on the slippery slope to personal and national destruction.