“Furthermore, a soldier going into battle, must be prepared to be bathed in the blood of his comrades, as often happens in the heat of battle. Considering the enormous disproportion of STDs among active homosexuals, especially AIDS,[3] this would put innocent servicemen at risk of contracting behavior-related illnesses from which they would be free, otherwise. It would unnecessarily endanger their safety. These moral issues must be considered. Thus, paraphrasing the words of Aubrey Sarvis, allowing active homosexuals to openly serve in the military is outrageous, insensitive and disrespectful to the vast majority of America’s normal troops.”
It’s about time SOMEONE finally made this point!
I have been trying to remind people I know about the situations where a soldier finds himself up to his elbows in another soldier’s blood (think “Blackhawk Down” and “Saving Private Ryan”). This is just part of the job and no soldier gives it a second thought when another soldier needs help.
Let’s protect them as much as we can!
An inconvenient truth that has been covered up by the homosexual labby with the complicity of pro-homosexual politicians is that AIDS is a disease that is spread by homosexual behavior, that such behavior is medically unsafe, that the blood of many active homosexuals is tainted by HIV. In combat, this becaomes a problem. So soldiers have to put on gloves like medical and dental practitioners? Even to put the question is to be thought “homophobic” by people who ought to know better.