Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Souled_Out
You could not be further from the truth, all compassion for ones fellow man is not ‘idiot’ compassion.

I didn't say that and neither did the article I linked to.

I, as a caring human, can feel sympathy for the parents, and loved ones of a 17-year-old boy,...

Which accomplishes nothing other than reinforcing the making of stupid choices.

... and abstain from posting stupid comments in a forum without believing it is compassionate to kill the innocent unborn.

I don't know how you managed to work the abortion card into this but you've have long since passed the point of abstaining from posting stupid comments. In fact you worked one right into that statement. LOL

187 posted on 06/29/2008 2:49:23 PM PDT by TigersEye (Freedom is just another word for nothing left to lose. Freeedooommm!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
"I don't know how you managed to work the abortion card into this but you've have long since passed the point of abstaining from posting stupid comments.
The following is a direct quote from the article you linked to in a comparison of compassion to 'idiot' compassion. Emphasis is mine.

"The "compassionate" left would rather have us believe that the detainees at Guantanamo, the murderers and rapists in our prisons, the violent Palestinians and other Islamo-fascists are the rightful and primary objects of our care and concern.

• Idiot compassion invents Miranda rights to protect criminals from prosecution rather than allowing police powers to protect innocent citizens.

• Idiot compassion is so concerned with the rights of terrorists that it sabotages legitimate Patriot Act procedures designed to protect Americans from murderous organizations.

• Idiot compassion is so fearful that one innocent man might be imprisoned that it helps enact laws that insure freedom to thousands of certainly guilty ones, by disallowing evidence obtained against them.

• Idiot compassion is so deeply concerned with the feelings and freedom of young women, that it goes to great lengths to insure that these young women are allowed to destroy their unborn children, rather than endure the hardship of responsibility for their sexual conduct."


Obviously the 'abortion card' was played by you, although you obviously do not have either the ability to read your own posts or comprehend what you are reading.

"Which accomplishes nothing other than reinforcing the making of stupid choices."


Yet another example of you inability understand simple statements.

The sympathy I expressed is for the "parents and loved ones" of the boy. Read it slowly, maybe it will become clearer to you and you can explain the 'stupid mistakes" they made.

"I didn't say that and neither did the article I linked to."


Obviously you do not know what either of us said. The sentence is a statement not an accusation.

Try removing your cranium from your rectum before you try to post again.

I do not mean to confuse you with big words. The cranium is the part of the skull that encloses the brain and the rectum is, well try finding a dictionary if you can not figure that one out.

188 posted on 06/29/2008 3:25:21 PM PDT by Souled_Out (Our hope is in the power of God working through the hearts of people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson