[gitmo]

Her eyes fell on this untrue sentence: “ALSO, keep in mind that when he was sworn into office he DID NOT use the Holy Bible, but instead the Kuran (Their equivalency to our Bible, but very different beliefs).” The use of “their equivalency” and the spelling of “Kuran” instead of “Koran” made the sentence her point of departure. That search showed that the first mention of the e-mail on the Internet had come more than a year earlier. A participant on the conservative Web site FreeRepublic.com posted a copy of the e-mail on Jan. 8, 2007, and added this line at the end: “Don’t know who the original author is, but this email should be sent out to family and friends.”

Funny. Google does not give a hit on that phrase except those posting this article.

[gitmo]

Never mind. Found it. Here I remember that thread.

[imintrouble]

While the strawman diversion of Obama’s faith obfuscation is interesting, in the interest of freedom of religion there is little we can do unless he is honest with the people

More important if the issue of his rightful birth regarding his campaigning for the Presidency.

Where is his true birthplace and under what circumstances was he born in the State of Hawaii to an ineligible female?

And why do his people not clear that very very simple issue - with a sworn affidavit of authenticity by the State of Hawaii.

At this moment in time his religion matters less than his right to the Presidency.

Was Barack Obama born in the United States of America to an American mother of legal age?