BTW.... her whole thesis was disproven, because neither Freeper mentioned had anything to do with the e-mails. Therefore, her main objective was to chill discussion/ participation at FR, not to develop some pseudo -scientific methodology about information dissemination. Why would a “scientist” publicize a failed experiment?
See post #78 and you may understand.
She will find that patriots are not held back. She will increase the speculation of Obama, his religion, his true motives, his ties one hundred fold.
Why would he care that people knew he had muslim leanings - all liberals do. They are always on the side of terrorists, even to the point of bringing them to the U.S. so that their message will be blasted on the air for a year during their trials.
They are too dumb to see that a country unprotected (especially one of the richest in the world) will not long survive. And if a population is so ignorant as to deny threats and believe propaganda, they will be led by a dictator.
Freedom is not guaranteed. It has been fought for and millions have died for it. Be careful how you handle the gift of freedom you were handed at birth Ms. D. Allen.
Funny - blacks fall all over themselves jumping on the bandwagon of a black candidate for President ignoring what the man stands for, what he will do to their hard won rights of freedom and equality. All on the “carrot” thrown out -”Change”.
They never give a thought to the fact that all those gains could be lost in a 4-year period by believing that someone mentioning “change” will give them the “change” they want. They just assume he means he will give them their heart’s desire and that he is one of them.
Not true - all indications are that he is selling them a bill of goods and all efforts will lower their standard of living, will put all power in his hands and be a major step toward a dictatorship for them. All their goals down the drain because they want to believe “change” means what they think “change” will mean.