No. it's the Theory of Evolution being discussed. It is a pretender trying to gain acceptance as science. Just because many learned people accept it's premises, does not make it the truth.
For further research, see also: Man-made Global Warming; moon is made of green cheese; "I'll respect you in the morning"...
My dog, Spot!
Trying? It achieved that around a century ago.
Just because many learned people accept it's premises, does not make it the truth.
I see a glimmer of hope for you there. "Accept it's [sic] premises" is correct, as that's what you do in science. But "truth" has nothing to do with the subject of science.
Science doesn’t arbitrate Truth. It finds things (theories) that work for now...
Evolution is one of the key theories. It is central to our understanding of biology.
The fact you don’t like that doesn’t change science one bit. You are not qualified. Neither am I. I’m not trying to redefine science to include creationism. Hint a PhD in a closely related field is a prerequisite for being taken seriously in some circles (not always correctly, but it keeps the signal to noise ratio up, unlike these discussions).
Perhaps if you started studying now you could contribute to the discussion in 10 or 15 years.