Wow!
I never knew that!
I had no idea they were that incompetent!
So, now I am more than ever asking myself why they are not looking at bioterrororism as the most likely explanation for this stuff.
Can anyone clue me in?
It seems to me that 1) they've warned us that the enemy is considering such an attack, 2) we're susceptible to such an attack, 3) the known facts are completely consistent with such an attack, and [drumroll], 4) the known facts are completely inconsistent with any other rational cause.
What are we NOT being told???
It is simply a test for efficacy of the vector for future action with a much more potent pathogen. But by whom????