[kingu]

You can’t have a citizen militia without private gun ownership and use, moron. I kept looking to see if this was satire or not... It’s amazing how liberals have a hard time reading clear language, but can find same sex marriage and abortion where there is no language that supports it.

But conservatives are ‘activists’ - Look, if we were activists, child molesters would still be on the execution list.

[A_Former_Democrat]

Right on . . or find “diversity” where the law clearly states “NO person” . . .

[singfreedom]

Maybe the dim libs read it as only meaning “militias” such as the one to which Timothy McVeigh belonged? There are LOTS of kinds of militias. /sarcasm

One of the most important portions of the legal argument was concerning the framers’ intent. Their “intent” is supported by all kinds of documentation written by the likes of Jefferson. Even if the amendment itself is nebulous or ambiguous, there is certainly nothing “ambiguous” about the intent of Jefferson's other writing on the subject!

This ass is just another sore loser, working his butt off, trying to find parity between activist and strict constructionist judges. Keep looking, fella, you've not found it yet.