Posted on 06/26/2008 8:25:20 AM PDT by SJackson
This is very good news. Let’s just see if Obambi disses those black activists.
When will Barack Obama attack Project 21 for “acting White”?
Souter, the self proclaimed “libertarian”, voted against. What a piec of sh$t he is.
Libertarian, my ass.
"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus
Yes and three other liberal dumb a**es that sit on the bench with him voted against also. This is a great decision and affirms, specifically, the individuals right, versus a collective right, to keep and bear arms. It also says if a license is required IT MUST BE issued to a law abiding citizen. Hopefully this will force all states to become shall issue on concealed carry. It is a slap in the face to all the liberals, including DiFi and Barbara Boxer of CA, who claimed the 2nd amendment was a collective right. Everyone should really read Scalia’s majority decision.
Frightning that this was a 5:4 vote.
Sununu and Rudman are to blame as well, snakes.
He was a federal judge for all of two months before he was nominated to the court.
An absolute disgrace.
Oh Obama will attack them since they are self-proclaimed Conservatives.
a RED LETTER day...
We should make it a Grass Roots Holiday - just to stick the pin in each year.......
That grinding, grating sound you hear: the clenching of teeth in Washington and the obamamama camp.
I think I'm going to take myself off for a lobster/steamer lunch on the bay to celebrate
What does this decision mean for those people convicted of violating DC’s now unconstitutional gun laws?
“That’s not the Project 21 I know.”
and we need to keep this in mind - if we let the obamamama into power - the SCOTUS will get tilted back to the totalitariat - and this will be revisited
Father Pfleger, the Jeremiah Wright wannabe, is deeply saddened.
Finally a long over due decision, but, we’re not in the clear yet folks:
Even though the individual right is affirmed (5 to 4), there are other issues not addressed, Jdude has the 411 on them at his blog I suggest you check them out and press your .GOV employee on them:
http://unstoppablemadman.blogspot.com/
The problem is that Democrats want to pick the Supreme Court nominees when they are in power and when they are not in power.
Compare and contrast with the UK. Having a written Constitution is a good thing. The Brits rolled over long ago and gave up their guns, at the same time their government was allowing their country to be overrun with blood-thirsty foreigners who now feel free to kill native Brits in the street. Next the UK bans “long, pointy” knives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.