To: TeleStraightShooter
*sigh* that was Bork's seat on the SCOTUS.
Bork was/is an outright statist. I don't exaggerate much when I say that he never met a law passed by a legilature that he didn't like. I've heard him and read his writings, and this is not a pro-gun judge. Frankly, I'm not unhappy that he didn't get to the Court.
907 posted on
06/26/2008 2:08:47 PM PDT by
Ancesthntr
(An ex-citizen of the Frederation dedicated to stopping the Obomination from becoming President)
To: Ancesthntr
I am reading the majority opinion again, and I think it is a bigger win than we at first thought.
EG, Scalia argues that just as you can not restrict keep, you can not restrict bear (open carry).
908 posted on
06/26/2008 2:10:58 PM PDT by
patton
(cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
To: Ancesthntr
Also, I don’t think that I have ever seen one justice refer to another as “mad as a hatter” before.
Wow.
911 posted on
06/26/2008 2:20:39 PM PDT by
patton
(cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
To: Ancesthntr
Ok, I’m game, what justice, current or otherwise, would vote the closest to Borks voting pattern?
1,029 posted on
06/26/2008 9:16:55 PM PDT by
TeleStraightShooter
(What value does Black Liberation Theology hold in a post racial Republic?)
To: Ancesthntr
Bork was/is an outright statist. I don't exaggerate much when I say that he never met a law passed by a legilature that he didn't like. I've heard him and read his writings, and this is not a pro-gun judge. Frankly, I'm not unhappy that he didn't get to the Court. Yes, I also think that Mr. Bork would have voted with the four dissenting judges.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson