I alno noticed than laws on Gun locks, gun safes ect are null and void since they make it impossible for citizens to use them for the corelawful purpose of self-defense and is hence unconstitutional.
Well, those things are probably justified now be saying that they're public safety measures, so people would probably try to argue that they fall into the same category with the prior-restrainty feeling "schools and government buildings" phrase.
I'm upset that Scalia put that and the gun purchase loophole in, but maybe he had to in order to pick up Kennedy.