So the plurality of republicans who voted for McCain should have their choice negated by the losers, because the losers refuse to support the party choice?
And when we get a conservative, I presume you will allow the moderates to do the same to our candidate? No? It just works one way?
If you want a conservative, find one, get all the conservatives to agree on them, and then support them enough to get a majority of the votes in the primary.
We had control over who was the nominee. The conservatives may well be a majority, and if we had found a compelling conservative they would have drawn moderates as well.
But we didn't. We had 3 candidates. And none of them were acceptable to all the different types of conservatives.
John McCain, Duncan Hunter, The Huckleberry, The Mormon, Fred Thompson, Rudy!...
Does somebody have a problem with counting?
The dims and independents elected McVain in the rotton open primaries of our first half dozen primaries. 90% of Conservatives never even really had a vote in this go-around.
I , as well as all other registered Republicans were thrown under the bus in favor of dims and squishy independents in a few Eastern states. McVain wonders why he gets no $$$$$$. Does he really expect dims and the squishy middle to donate heavily? Does he really think dims and the linguini spined middle would raise hell in another Floriduh fiasco on his behalf?
While many of us feel compelled to vote for him, some do not, but remember ...... McPain and the RINO section of the party rejected we who are on the right.
If the primary system of our party is not corrected by 2012, I will look to another party .
Nam Vet