Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pabianice

“The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditional lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home.

Uh-oh. Can this ruling be used to prohibit self defense outside the home?”

No. The “such as” is an example without limitation. It like saying “Sports cars go fast, such as a Porsche.” It doesn’t mean there are not other fast cars besides a Porsche.


504 posted on 06/26/2008 7:45:41 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Kol Hakavod Mossad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies ]


To: MeanWestTexan; pabianice
Uh-oh. Can this ruling be used to prohibit self defense outside the home?”

No. The “such as” is an example without limitation. It like saying “Sports cars go fast, such as a Porsche.” It doesn’t mean there are not other fast cars besides a Porsche.

Agreed. I think Scalia wrote it that way because it specifically addresses the case before the court. Heller's case came about because he was denied a gun in his home, where he was assaulted. So Scalia called attention to that particular use of a gun as his example.

602 posted on 06/26/2008 8:03:37 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson