Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TonyInOhio

I happy that Heller was affirmed, but I’m shocked that it was a 5 - 4 decision. Should have been 9 - 0.

All of the amendments to the Constitution are individual rights. In addition, the founding fathers, in their papers, were absolutely clear about gun ownership being an individual right (to enable the citizens to fight back against a possible tyranny).

To be honest, I was going to stay home on election day because I’m not all that thrilled with McCain.

However, after realizing that we are only one Supreme Court justice removed from losing our rights and our country, I’ve changed my mind and I’ll be voting on November 4th for McCain. Judges in general.....and the Supreme Court in particular....is the reason I’ll vote; plus we, as a country, can’t put our military and the War on Terror in the hands of Obama and his fellow commies.


369 posted on 06/26/2008 7:27:09 AM PDT by july4thfreedomfoundation (My idea of the Fairness Doctrine: Nancy Pelosi shuts her damn pie hole and never speaks again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]


To: july4thfreedomfoundation
To be honest, I was going to stay home on election day because I’m not all that thrilled with McCain.

However, after realizing that we are only one Supreme Court justice removed from losing our rights and our country, I’ve changed my mind and I’ll be voting on November 4th for McCain. Judges in general.....and the Supreme Court in particular....is the reason I’ll vote;

Exactly what a lot of people on FR need to realize - there are too many potential SCOTUS decisions to fritter this one away, folks. An Obama presidency locks up the court for the next 20 years...

445 posted on 06/26/2008 7:35:44 AM PDT by Tirian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies ]

To: july4thfreedomfoundation

You are correct. It should have been 9-0. It was, as they say, a “no-brainer”.

With that said, I have just read Breyer’s dissent.

I can only conclude that he does not understand his job. He is more concerned about the potential adverse effects the decision might have on OTHER gun laws than with the Consitutional issues associated with this case.

Then again, maybe HE is just a “no-brainer”.


521 posted on 06/26/2008 7:48:43 AM PDT by WayneS (Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson