Posted on 06/24/2008 3:16:24 PM PDT by The Raven
Federal Communications Commission Chairman Kevin J. Martin said yesterday that he will support a merger between the nation's sole satellite radio operators, XM and Sirius, a decision that could remove the last regulatory hurdle in the lengthy and heavily criticized move to make the companies one.
...
The companies have agreed to:
... set aside 4 percent of their radio spectrums, or 12 channels, for noncommercial services such as educational and public safety programming. They would lease another 12 channels for programming run by minorities and women, groups that are underrepresented in entertainment broadcasting
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Pay for non-Nanny radio? Absolutely.
I don't believe such a critter exists. The Left has denied in print many times for years that there is no homosexual "agenda". There is no goal. No endgame.
Oh come on.
Nothing quite like cutting off your nose to spite your face.
As far as I can see, paid programming like XM/Sirius, is not going to be subject to the "fairness" doctrine if the RATs ever manage to resurrect that. And if Obama wins in November, look for it to be back less than 12 weeks after the coronation.
The article said they were going to set aside the channels. Big whoop. They will still be able to charge something for them. Or, even if bad comes to worse, and they have to give away the airtime for free, they don't have to subsidize the content.
No one listened when it was free, and no one is going to pay to listen to cr@p. Without a subsidy for content, liberals, community groups, and "underrepresented" groups are going to have a hard time competing.
Plus, one of the big reasons talk radio is so successful is that radio is the medium for people with jobs. The mindless unemployed watch TV, those with something worthwhile to do listen driving to work or sometimes at work. This is not a liberal audience.
If the price of having conservative pay radio is that they also carry liberal channels no one will listen to, that is the price and I am willing to pay it.
I am an XM subscriber. If this merger goes through, I will cancel. I have no intention of supporting a company that supports Howard Stern and his garbage.
...then don’t listen to stern. if you have cable tv, then you already have seedy content that you skip. do the same and enjoy the music, sports, and conservative talk.
You're right, of course. The Agenda is a program, not an entire channel. My bad.
Yet you support Opie and Anthony.
“To all: Please cancel your subscription if the Government forces left wing content —”
Will do.
“groups that are underrepresented in entertainment broadcasting” LOL
That’s a laugh.
Will conservatives get equal time OR ELSE!
“YOU will pay for keeping the liberal channels on the air.”
See the devious always comes up with something. I refuse to buy any of it.
Lefty broadcasting is not worth it.
>>It all balances out
No...when the government gets involved - that’s dangerous. It’s not free speech if it’s forced on us.
And “forced” can be subtle - so as to look like the companies are “volunterring” to do this.
>>If the price of having conservative pay radio is that they also carry liberal channels no one will listen to, that is the price and I am willing to pay it.
But...if politicians were successful in shaping content in the past.....why not in the future?
If no one listens to the lib channel - they just close down the conservative channel.
It’s why the NRA goes after even the smallest attacks on the 2nd amendment.
You are supporting Oprah, Opie and Anthony, and other crap.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.