Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Rep. Joe Pitts represents the 16th Congressional District of Pennsylvania. Rep. Phil English represents the 3rd Congressional District of Pennsylvania.
1 posted on 06/24/2008 6:38:09 AM PDT by K-oneTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: K-oneTexas

This is pathetic. Supposedly business-savvy congressmen think Oil companies want to spend billions of dollars to lower their profit margin.


2 posted on 06/24/2008 6:45:50 AM PDT by Philly Nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas
What a fairy tale as America is going to “vote” overwhelmingly for a veto-proof Congress to protect America's environment!!
3 posted on 06/24/2008 6:46:47 AM PDT by kcm.org (I was paying $0.99/gal before dims stole Congress!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

It might be worthwhile to site a new refinery near existing crude and finished product pipelines. Supplying an oil refinery by truck doesn’t work very well.


4 posted on 06/24/2008 6:46:51 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

They are going the right way - the use of closed military bases may not make sense, but the premise that Congress is voting on ridiculous legislation should be highlighted and screamed on the highest mountain. They should be revoking legislation already passed that has crippled and hampered our energy independence.


6 posted on 06/24/2008 7:01:06 AM PDT by KEmom (Please send viable Republican candidates to Massachusetts!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas
Captive Primate Safety Act

I thought I'd cease to be a captive primate when I left the Army just to learn my real captor is Congress.

7 posted on 06/24/2008 7:09:03 AM PDT by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas; All

HR 2279 proposes refineries on closed military bases for supplying the military. See post #3 on this thread as a possible solution for supplying refined products for civilian consumption:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2035624/posts


10 posted on 06/24/2008 8:10:39 AM PDT by shove_it (and have a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas
In fact, in 2007, according to the Energy Information Administration, the United States imported 148 million barrels of finished gasoline for use in our cars and trucks. That is on top of the billions of barrels of crude oil we imported.

148 million x 55 gallons = ~ 8.14 billion gallons

That's about 2 years gasoline usage for 2 medium-large states.

11 posted on 06/24/2008 9:33:56 AM PDT by an amused spectator (corruptissima republica, plurimae leges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: K-oneTexas

If the intent is to expand fuel production with new plants, build coal to liquid. Oil refineries are not a sensible investment at this point.


13 posted on 06/24/2008 9:39:17 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson