Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A High School Finds Itself Left Behind and Drowning (Review of HBO film)
The New York Times ^ | June 23, 2008 | NEIL GENZLINGER

Posted on 06/23/2008 4:10:42 PM PDT by Amelia

...they take lingering looks at Douglass’s teachers and administrators as they work and at its students as they, more often than not, don’t work. Though eventually the Raymonds (just barely) take sides — they seem not to be fans of Mr. Bush’s program — their dismaying film isn’t really asking whether No Child Left Behind can help Douglass. It’s asking whether anything can.

The film finds a few success stories among the school’s 1,100 students, but it is filled largely with teenagers who are drowning in apathy and attitude, those who seem well beyond any “To Sir With Love”-style rescue.

It is filled as well with emptiness. At “back-to-school night” for parents early in the school year the camera pans the auditorium; it is largely empty. At the Christmas concert the school’s well-regarded choir is belting out a lovely “Messiah,” again to a largely empty auditorium....

HBO, Monday night at 9, Eastern and Pacific times; 8, Central time.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS: education; hbo; nclb; school
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
I'm looking forward to watching at least some of it, but the review seems to obliquely suggest that parental involvement is very important for a school to be successful.
1 posted on 06/23/2008 4:10:42 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Gabz; SoftballMominVA; abclily; aberaussie; albertp; AliVeritas; Amelia; A_perfect_lady; ...

Public Education Ping

This list is for intellectual discussion of articles and issues related to public education (including charter schools) from the preschool to university level. Items more appropriately placed on the “Naughty Teacher” list, “Another reason to Homeschool” list, or of a general public-school-bashing nature will not be pinged.

If you would like to be on or off this list, please freepmail Amelia, Gabz, Shag377, or SoftballMominVa

2 posted on 06/23/2008 4:11:43 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
parental involvement is very important for a school to be successful.


3 posted on 06/23/2008 4:13:18 PM PDT by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poser
...parental involvement is very important for a school to be successful.
4 posted on 06/23/2008 4:20:03 PM PDT by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Amelia; Gabz; shag377
Excerpts from the WaPo review - very telling

At the time of filming, many of the students read at an elementary school level. More than 500 freshmen matriculate each year yet only 50 percent return for their sophomore year. Only 10 percent passed the reading proficiency tests; math scores are at 1 percent. Some 67 percent of the teachers are not certified.

snip

"Urban education is a moral tragedy in this country," ...If you're depressed [after seeing the documentary], it means that we've succeeded."

I'm interested in seeing this movie and I'd like to ask the help of anyone who believes, like I do, that the state of urban education is shameful, how does anyone, charter, private, home schooled, teach a child who is a senior, reads at an elementary level, and doesn't want to be taught, to learn?

I'm looking forward to the suggestions and insights from the learned Freepers here.

5 posted on 06/23/2008 4:20:16 PM PDT by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SoftballMominVA

Urban eduacation is bad because THE KIDS DON’T CARE. Nothing less, nothing more. They largely have no fathers in the home, and nobody to tell them that learning and education matters.

Therefore, they don’t care. And no amount of money, or NCLB program, is going to change that.


6 posted on 06/23/2008 4:22:13 PM PDT by RockinRight (I just paid $63 for gas. An icefield in Alaska is NOT the Grand Canyon. F--- the caribou.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Poser
Yeah, I know. Here's another one I found interesting:

66 percent of the Douglass educators are not certified, we’re told. The school is running on substitutes and other emergency fill-ins. And that is the bottom line for schools like this. Bureaucrats can make all the rules and set all the benchmarks they want, but none of it will change anything if no one can be found to do the hands-on work of teaching. As seen in this film, it’s not just a thankless job; it looks disconcertingly as if it might be an impossible one.

7 posted on 06/23/2008 4:22:45 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Amelia

I thought the South lost the Civil War.


8 posted on 06/23/2008 4:26:20 PM PDT by Crawdad (If you're in a fair fight, your tactics suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RockinRight

Would charters or vouchers solve it, in your opinion?


9 posted on 06/23/2008 4:26:32 PM PDT by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Amelia

Human teachers are obsolete. Replace them all with computers. The most interesting learning I ever experienced was computer based. If the kid has a question or needs clarification, you could have one “teacher” a thousand miles away provide the info.


10 posted on 06/23/2008 4:30:14 PM PDT by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
I'm looking forward to watching at least some of it, but the review seems to obliquely suggest that parental involvement is very important for a school to be successful.

Parental involvement is essential to whether a student performs, regardless of the school's perfomance.

There is a lot wrong with our ed system, but I say kids fail, not schools. It starts at home.

11 posted on 06/23/2008 4:31:14 PM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoftballMominVA

Charters and vouchers only solve the problem if the kids want to learn and the parents want something better for their kids. Unfortunately, it seems that modern day poverty in the U.S. is not so much a matter of circumstance, but choice. There are more than enough programs to get people out of poverty but those people have to want to use them.


12 posted on 06/23/2008 4:33:49 PM PDT by Accygirl (My Savior already came to the Earth.. His name was Jesus, not Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Amelia

The state took over the school system in Helena, Arkansas just for these reasons.


13 posted on 06/23/2008 4:34:08 PM PDT by Terry Mross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
Human teachers are obsolete. Replace them all with computers. The most interesting learning I ever experienced was computer based. If the kid has a question or needs clarification, you could have one “teacher” a thousand miles away provide the info.

Do you think that would help the students in this story do better? Or would they just be looking up rap lyrics and cool tennis shoes?

14 posted on 06/23/2008 4:34:56 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bobkk47
Human teachers are obsolete. Replace them all with computers. The most interesting learning I ever experienced was computer based. If the kid has a question or needs clarification, you could have one “teacher” a thousand miles away provide the info.

If a student read 6 grades below grade level and didn't want to learn, would this work in that case?

15 posted on 06/23/2008 4:35:45 PM PDT by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross

They couldn’t get enough certified teachers? Were the students that bad, or was there another reason?


16 posted on 06/23/2008 4:37:50 PM PDT by Amelia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoftballMominVA

“Would charters or vouchers solve it, in your opinion?”

As long as parents are not interested in helping their children NO school can make up all of the disadvantages these children start with and have to endure.

If public schools could discipline, dismiss and choose their students like private schools their success rate would be the same.

Vouchers only help a small minority of students and are a bailout for the parochial school system which in many cases in no better that the public system. Their shining examples are usually selective high tuition schools. This is why in many areas the parochial schools refuse to be tested and compared on an even footing with the public schools.

Before we start another “government program” lets see where we stand on both sides. Bleeding one system to help another may be a bad idea in the long one. My wife has taught in both and she hates the Priests (ministers) and the teachers unions equally. They have their own agendas.


17 posted on 06/23/2008 4:40:28 PM PDT by A Strict Constructionist (We have become an oligarchy not a Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SoftballMominVA
how does anyone, charter, private, home schooled, teach a child who is a senior, reads at an elementary level, and doesn't want to be taught, to learn?

You don't. It is possible to inspire someone to want to learn, but there is no way (in our society) to force them to learn.

In a theoretical society, public flogging or execution of the lowest-scoring student in the school at the end of each week would work wonders. But we're not allowed to use such drastic methods.

18 posted on 06/23/2008 4:45:43 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
Are these teachers uncertified because they don't know the subject, or because they don't have teaching certificates? (I expect the latter.)
19 posted on 06/23/2008 4:46:04 PM PDT by NathanR (Obama: More 'African' than 'American'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
66 percent of the Douglass educators are not certified, we’re told. The school is running on substitutes and other emergency fill-ins.

These teachers are not poor teachers because they aren't certified, but because they are poor teachers.

Certification does not magically make someone a good teacher.

BTW, over 30 years ago Marva Collins proved that even the worst students can be taught successfully. It requires hard work, dedicated teachers and committed parents. And very little attention to the "fad of the year" in teaching methods.

We've known how to teach students for centuries. We just aren't doing it.

20 posted on 06/23/2008 4:49:34 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. - A. Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson