Recently, in a speech by John Coleman, the founder of the Weather Channel, he suggested that this needs to happen and said that some legal eagles he knows are looking into it. I sincerely hope this is true. I'd contribute money to support the effort!
While I believe this to be a good idea superficially, once you consider the ultimate conclusion of having a judge and/or jury decide on what is scientifically sound, is not.
Any judge and/or jury that are nothing more than political hacks could be the arbitors for what would be the worst decision of modern history.
I simply do not trust the legal system to be competent enough to provide a verdict based on fact.