Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Free ThinkerNY
I lost all respect for Armstrong Williams when he admitted he took payola. J.C. Watts, however, was on Hannity's radio show shortly after this column was published, and clarified his statements.

Watts said that his remark about Obama being more dedicated to issues of poverty and urban policy was NOT an endorsement or an indication that he would vote for him, it was just a statement of what he expected from the first black President, considering that white Dems have made promises galore over the years and not delivered. His complaint was that in the same way the Dems take black voters for granted, Republicans take for granted that black voters are beyond their reach, and make only feeble efforts to reach out to them.

33 posted on 06/22/2008 6:53:06 PM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Hussein-feld: A campaign about nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: L.N. Smithee
Watts said that his remark about Obama being more dedicated to issues of poverty and urban policy

In a way, this was brilliant set-up for failure of Obama because no donkey policy on poverty or urban issues CAN succeed, even if pursued by a dedicated black man who empathize with young, poor, single mothers.

They get policy wrong because they get human nature wrong. There is no possibility Obama can succeed in wiping out poverty than LBJ did.

51 posted on 06/22/2008 7:24:14 PM PDT by wo fat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson