Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: neverdem

With a national test like the SAT you get compared to your peers, not against your classmates at podunk high. Bottom line, getting rid of the SAT is a bad idea, and is really only about increasing the power and discretion of admissions officers to do the social engineering they so want to do.


2 posted on 06/22/2008 3:10:14 PM PDT by RKV (He who has the guns makes the rules)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: RKV

I did horrible on the SAT, but I had great grades from a good high school in Dallas. I also took hard classes in high school.

I got a degree in computer science from Texas A&M. I was originally a chemical engineering major. Most of the class flunked out of chem E after their freshman and sophomore years. These were even National Merit Scholars. I never flunked out (but I did change out of Chem E my junior year because I hated it).

I know that I had to work hard in college, and the people that didn’t work hard didn’t do well.


9 posted on 06/22/2008 3:59:42 PM PDT by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: RKV
With a national test like the SAT you get compared to your peers, not against your classmates at podunk high. Bottom line, getting rid of the SAT is a bad idea

And yet, contrary to your assertion, high school grades remain a better predictor of success than the SAT.

10 posted on 06/22/2008 4:03:27 PM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson