[upsdriver]

U.N. Atom Chief Warns of "Fireball" if Iran Attacked

So be it!

[Anti-Bubba182]

"....prompt Tehran to launch a crash course to build nuclear weapons. "

What does this idiot think is going on now?

[allmost]

The advice is to run and hide.

[SatinDoll]

Anybody happen to know where, from what home nation, Mohamad ElBaradei originally hails.

[I see my hands]

To: Mohamad ElBaradei

"A military strike, in my opinion, would be worse than anything"

Anything? Worse than anything? You're a dangerous simpleton.

[BunnySlippers]

A fireball in the Middle East. Hmm ...

[spyone]

This man comments more on areas outside his jurisdiction than anyone I’ve seen. Why can’t he just become proficient at his appointed task. He’s had a decade to become conpetent, but has failed miserably.

[LjubivojeRadosavljevic]

"If you do a military strike, it will mean that Iran, if it is not already making nuclear weapons, will launch a crash course to build nuclear weapons with the blessing of all Iranians, even those in the West."

Hate to say it...but the secret is already out of the bottle - thanks Khan and Pakistan.

Anyway, a sudden attack on Iran, will yield - in the short run - an increase in the popularity of the Iranian regime (amongst the Iranian People).

Keep that in mind.

[cacoethes_resipisco]

If you attacked Iran and there wasn’t a fireball, wouldn’t that mean you were doing it wrong?

[machenation]

You know that it looks to me, if Israel pulls a sneak attack they will have to carpet bomb. They will have to stop Iran’s money flow, stop all energy output. I suppose the best option is do nothing for the sake of the world and this country. The way I figure to beat them is 1500 neutron weapons but I think France is the only one to build them.

Have Fun

[Tzimisce]

Really? So after MONTHS AND MONTHS AND MONTHS of assurances from the UN that Iran’s nuke program was “Years from making a nuke” - now they’re afraid that Iran will drop one in the next few months?

The UN is a bunch of lying c***s*****s.......

[Eye of Unk]

If I remember my history correctly Japan surrendered after being hit twice, does it take 4 warheads in Iran to force a surrender?

Personally I think it would be better to just go after a single target.

[Conservative Vermont Vet]

"If you do a military strike, it will mean that Iran, if it is not already making nuclear weapons, will launch a crash course to build nuclear weapons with the blessing of all Iranians, even those in the West."

WTF? Not already making nuclear weapons?

Nah, of course not you freekin moron

Moreover, if the head of the IAEA doesn't know, who to hell does?

"If a military strike is carried out against Iran at this time ... it would make me unable to continue my work,"

BEST news I've heard in a long time. Leave it to the UN to appoint a Moozie from a Mosslimb country to oversee other Mooslimbs who are developing WMD's and expect them to be objective??

Though it is hard to imagine anyone more incompetent and anti-US than his predecessor (Hans--"Boobie" Blix) this moron is by far, worse.