“You are trying to use that a proof, “
(now you’ve got me doing it!)
You are trying to use that as proof.
Well either she was for the lawyer doing this or she was against the lawyer doing it. One could not make out she was against the lawyer’s efforts until much later in the article. Did you start out reading it the way I did, that she was getting protection from harassment and intimidation? But really she was unavailable because she was trying to change lawyers. I think you are parsing for debate sake now.