Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CindyDawg; SouthTexas

“No one should take 3 hours of lecturing from a non-client. “


Maybe that is why she filed for the protection order.

Others have said there is no proof that he was interfering with the girl’s rights, or any FLDS member’s rights, or intimidating witnesses.

So, maybe she put up with it for 3 hours, to ‘prove’ her ‘case’ to the ‘court’.

Which may be why they are granting it.


80 posted on 06/21/2008 11:11:03 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2

“They”, the court, is really singular in this case:

Judge Barbara Walthers

Yes, that judge.


82 posted on 06/21/2008 11:17:06 AM PDT by commonguymd (Freedom and individual liberty is for everyone, including the odd and weird people like you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2

Could be. I wonder if she taped it?


84 posted on 06/21/2008 11:19:28 AM PDT by CindyDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2; CindyDawg
“No one should take 3 hours of lecturing from a non-client. “

That should only come from their lawyer or the state! :)

102 posted on 06/21/2008 12:08:53 PM PDT by SouthTexas (If you are not living on the edge, you are taking up too much space!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson