I absolutely guarantee that when lawyers get involved, truth becomes irrelevant. The legal system has very little to do with the truth it is all about winning or losing, that is it, period, end of story.
If the allegations that there are ‘child-brides’ turn out to be true, If it is true that a 15 year old girl was spiritually married to Raymond Jessop and he was over 35, then will that be your ‘mantra’ for claiming it is all a lie?
Do you understand that a 'spiritual' marriage does not necessarily mean a physical relationship at the time?
“I absolutely guarantee that when lawyers get involved, truth becomes irrelevant. The legal system has very little to do with the truth it is all about winning or losing, that is it, period, end of story.”
So, why the interest in this case, if you ‘know’ the truth will not come out, and it’s all about lawyers trying to better their record in court?
Because you ‘say’ it doesn’t , is that to be considered proof?
What proof do you have that these type of marriages were not consumated?
Isn’t it necessary to see the ‘evidence’ before making a judgment like that?
I know there has been a lot of speculation about what may have happened, but the ‘evidence’, if any, hasn’t been revealed yet.
Now, if I may continue, If there is proof that Raymond spiritually married a 15 year old, and consumated the marriage, then, would you accept that the law was violated?