Replies

“No, you are referring to the Guardian ad litem.”

No I am not. I am referring to an ‘attorney ad litem’

Would you like to see it in print? From a source?

“In an exclusive interview with Natalie Malonis, the woman appointed Attorney ad litem for three of the FLDS children and serving as co-counsel for one other child, we get answers to a few of those questions.”

http://wwwwakeupamericans-spree.blogspot.com/2008/05/exclusive-interview-with-natalie.html

“Obviously you didn’t. I just quoted her.”

You qouted one of her comments in a post. She made more than one post, more than one post to you.

Now that you see it in print, your insistence you are RIGHT, and that everyone else is WRONG, and that you know the answer to questions before you ask them, turns out to be a sham.

Wake up and smell the roses, as they say.

You qouted one of her comments in a post. She made more than one post, more than one post to you.

You essentially asked me to quote Alice in Wonderland and I did. "The child’s attorney is Natalie Malonis, and her guardian ad litem is Connie Gauwain." If you don't like it don't ask for it.

Now that you see it in print, your insistence you are RIGHT, and that everyone else is WRONG, and that you know the answer to questions before you ask them, turns out to be a sham.

Actually I just like hoisting bigots by their own petards :)