Well, apparently.
I just wait for you to catch up.
So you are claiming that the Attorney is the guardian too? Maybe you need to do the catching up. I rarely ask questions on threads like this that I don't already know the answer to : ) It is against the law for the attorney to be the clients legal guardian. I know that you aren't conversant with the law, maybe you should familiarize yourself with it before you spout off : )
Here is the post:
To: LeGrande
“Did I miss something? “
Well, apparently.
I just wait for you to catch up.
175 posted on Saturday, June 21, 2008 5:56:55 PM by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies | Report Abuse]
You added the “Is this Attorney the Lady’s guardian?”
and then pretended that is what my comment “Well, apparently”, referred to.
Either you went too fast, or you are too angry, or think everyone but you is stupid.
“So you are claiming that the Attorney is the guardian too?”
No. Never did. You are making that up, again.
Everyone gets it. You are always right. If you ask a question, it is not to learn, it is because you want to see what others say, and then ridicule them if they don’t give the answer you ‘know’ is right.
I never said any different. You are the only one saying it.
Well, apparently you don’t know the law very well, because you insist that the girl’s attorney for the Grand Jury hearings is a defense attorney.
Maybe you should take some of your own advice.