Oh but we do. All the young lady had to say was that she didn't want to go back to the FLDS and she wouldn't have been returned. That is positive proof that the lawyer is working against her wishes when she filed an order against returning the young lady.
For instance, the exact same evidence exists in a case of an unwilling witness, and an intimidated witness.
You are confusing a defense Attorney with a Prosecutor. To a defense attorney it makes absolutely no difference at all. I can see why you are confused though, the ladies Attorney isn't acting like a defense Attorney, she is acting exactly like a Prosecuting Attorney.
“That is positive proof that the lawyer is working against her wishes when she filed an order against returning the young lady.”
And the reason for the order, and what it involved have been explained.
“You are confusing a defense Attorney with a Prosecutor. “
No, I was talking about apples, and you went off comparing watermelons and squash.
And the lawyer in question is not a Defense lawyer, as you stipulate.
And no, she isn’t acting like a defense attorney, because that is not what she is.