The Attorney could never release the tape. It would be a clear abuse of the Attorney client privilege. This is a very clear case of the Attorney working against the wishes of the client. Even mentioning the existence of a tape starts to breach the Attorney client privilege.
It is clear that the Attorney thinks that she is acting in the best interests of the lady, despite the wishes of the lady. Attorneys in this position should always get out, they are in a no win situation.
One would think so, and I guess I don’t know about the tape issues and the legalities of client attorney privileges regarding tapes. This lady has screamed from the mountain tops to begin with on a national show with no peer support so she should probably recuse herself from taking part in the fiasco. The conflict of issues is too hard to overlook imo.
“Even mentioning the existence of a tape starts to breach the Attorney client privilege.”
The attorney didn’t mention it and neither did the article.
“It is clear that the Attorney thinks that she is acting in the best interests of the lady, despite the wishes of the lady. Attorneys in this position should always get out, they are in a no win situation. “
If it is against the wishes of the daughter, then I think the attorney would be smart to remove herself.