Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: commonguymd

“I think you are parsing for debate sake now.”

As you said to Alice, “do you read the posts”?


“One could not make out she was against the lawyer’s efforts until much later in the article. Did you start out reading it the way I did, that she was getting protection from harassment and intimidation? But really she was unavailable because she was trying to change lawyers.”

Everything you just said I already stated on several of the posts prior to this, and anyone can go back and see for themselves.

I even countered a poster who you ‘think’ is on ‘my side’, with the exact same thing you said in that last sentence.

I can go back and list all those posts for you, if it will help.


105 posted on 06/21/2008 12:21:51 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all pesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2

The absolute minutia of conversational debate that you get wrapped up in sometimes... lol. I give up on this one.


107 posted on 06/21/2008 12:27:48 PM PDT by commonguymd (Freedom and individual liberty is for everyone, including the odd and weird people like you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson