To: elhombrelibre
He’s considereed an anti-semite b/c some Jews don’t like him.
To: sobieski
Yeah, some of those Jews are always picking on Buchanan; it's just not fair when he's so considerate of them, the “stubborn Poles” (as Buchanan calls them), and other victims of Hitler. Poor Pat's just using his procrustean theory of isolationism on the history of WWII to undermine the fools who think we were right to fight and win it, just as he's done his best to undermine the war on terror. And, once you get started defending Saddam and his sovereignty why not defend poor old Hitler. Poor Pat.
357 posted on
06/21/2008 1:16:32 PM PDT by
elhombrelibre
(Isolationism and pacifism: the soft underbelly of American freedom.)
To: sobieski
He’s considereed an anti-semite b/c some Jews don’t like him. He's considered one because he exposed the John Demjanjuk fraud. Those who were embarassed have never let up since.
361 posted on
06/21/2008 1:20:09 PM PDT by
Hacksaw
(I support the San Fran tiger.)
To: sobieski
Would you define anything short of calls for murdering all Jews as antisemitic?
387 posted on
06/21/2008 6:32:50 PM PDT by
rmlew
(Down with the ersatz immanentization of the eschaton known as Globalism.)
To: sobieski
He’s considereed an anti-semite b/c some Jews don’t like him. He's considered a Jew-hater because he hates Jews.
397 posted on
06/22/2008 5:48:26 PM PDT by
Alouette
(Vicious Babushka)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson