I saw what you wrote in the post and I took it to mean a very sarcastic statement. How else did you intend it ?
Now, the usual bigot baiting crowd here uses the term like they are referring to the klan.
Morris Dees would be proud. Sad, these crybabies have taken over and wish to shout down anyone who has an eccentric view.
Given our current climate, if Buchanan right or wrong is so dastardly then why in hell is he treated reasonably on almost any media org one can find him on?
many in the media know him and given the intense scrutiny over anything even with a whiff of bucking PC views on anything minority in race or religion, one would think he would be ostracized by the media who knows him were he the Jew hater some here like to think.
Why is it that Jews and their collateral history cannot be critiqued even by association with regards to WII?
It grants exclusiveness which in the long run will end with resentment...mark my words. We have intellectually overcompensated in our collective culture over the horrors that happened in WWII to the point it could backfire and like anything else when terms like anti-semite, bigot or racist are used so casually, it diminishes the true effectiveness. That's not good.
What do you see that was sarcastic about this post?