The Jews who carried out all those conspiracies were non-observant Jews - observant Jews are also victims of this vast Jewish conspiracy!
Also, Antelman markets a product he calls Tetrasilver, which completely cures AIDS. Or so he says.
By the way, Antelman has another theory about how the NIH has engaged in a conspiracy to suppress the truth about Tetrasilver.
FYI
Rabbi Antelman (the Chief Justice of the Supreme Rabbinic Court of America) is a bit "Birchy," though he has (so far as know) never been a member and disagrees with them on some issues (for example, he demolishes one of the JBS' favorite historians, Nesta Webster). Whatever he may be, he is most assuredly not a "self-hating Jew." He is a strong Zionist and admirer of Rabbi Me'ir Kahana' (zt"l; Hy"d). He was also one of the founders of the so-alled "Sanhedrion" in Jerusalem, though he later quit out of frustration with the direction it was taking. And he absolutely detests anti-Semites.
The problem with Rabbi Antelman's work is that, because he deals almost exclusively with subversive elements and movements within Judaism, that the careless reader could walk away with the idea that these subversive ideas originated from within Judaism. As a matter of fact he says that most of the subversion that took place was from subversive chr*stians, but he is not a chr*stian and he is not writing about chr*stianity. He is writing about subversive currents in the Jewish community. In his first book he also cautions the reader against reading and then thinking "see what these Jews did" because it was centuries of chr*stian persecution of Jews that opened the latter up to victimization and exploitation by subversive elements (just as moslem persecution of Arab chr*stians opened up the latter to influence by Communism and French Freemasonry).
Rabbi Antelman should have spent more time placing the subversion of Judaism within the context of the subversion of chr*stianity in the West at that time. But since he was writing for Jews about the subversion of Judaism almost everything he writes is about subversive non-Orthodox Jews. Unfortunately, the careless reader may conclude that subversive non-Orthodox Jews invented evil.
That being said, it must be stressed that because the Jewish People are different from all other nations, because there is a difference between the Jewish and non-Jewish soul, Jews who do not pursue the Jewish purpose of learning and observing Torah are especially destructive in their influence on the world. This in no sense excuses anti-Semitism of any level, but it is a simple spiritual fact. Can you imagine how different the world would be if all those non-Orthodox Jews who have so influenced the world (for good or ill) in so many non-Torah ways had been pious and observant Jews? We might be living in the Kingdom of G-d on earth by this point. As Rabbi Lapin has said, deep within every Jew is a thirst for G-d and a desire to do something more than just merely exist. The correct answer to this yearning is Torah, but when Torah is rejected other philosophies are turned to, and the effect is much more acute than when subversive ideas are accepted by gentiles. After all, the purpose of the Jewish soul is to channel holiness into the world while non-Jewish souls then spread it about. Small wonder that Jews who reject Torah can be terribly destructive. This is based on mystical realities and has nothing to do with anti-Semitism whatsoever.
All that being said, I was very disappointed in the second volume. For one thing, he refers to Maurice Malkin many times as "Maurice Malcolm." Why? Is this an error? Is it carelessness? Or did Maurice Malkin use the name "Malcolm?" For another is the simple outlandishness of some of his claims, the most outlandish being that Adolf Hitler (mach shemo!) was conceived as part of a Sabbatian ritual on the night of Tish`ah Be'Av of 5648 (which was exactly nine months before 4/20/1889). I suppose such a thing is theoretically possible, but I doubt it. Also it seems to blame Nazism itself on those awful Jews, the source of all the evils in history (though granted, heretical Jews).
It is not for me to comment on Rabbi Antelman's Orthodoxy. So far as I know he is certainly a real Orthodox Rabbi (yadin yadin), a disciple of the late Rabbi Hutner (zt"l), and highly, if not universally, respected.
The guys sounds nuttier than squirrel poop, and nearly as nutty as Pukannon